EN

Guide · 6 min read · Updated 19 Oct 2026

ZIP vs RAR vs 7Z vs TAR.GZ: Which Should You Use?

A practical comparison of archive formats: compression ratio, speed, encryption and which devices open them, with a simple rule for choosing the right one.

Tools used in this guide

All archive formats are lossless: what goes in comes out identical. They differ in how small the result is, how fast it is to make, how well it's encrypted, and whether the receiver can open it.

Quick comparison

FormatSizeSpeedEncryptionOpens natively on
ZIPGoodFastAES-256 (names visible)Windows, Mac, iPhone, Android
7ZBestSlowerAES-256 + hidden namesWindows 11 only
RARVery goodMediumAES-256Windows 11 only (read)
TAR.GZGoodFastNoneMac, Linux, Windows 11
TAR.XZBest (≈7Z)SlowNoneMac, Linux

The simple rule

  • Sending to anyone: ZIP. It always opens.
  • Need the smallest file or real secrecy: 7Z with Ultra compression and “Encrypt file names”. See Compress Files.
  • Uploading to a Linux server or cPanel: TAR.GZ. See Create TAR.GZ.
  • Received a RAR: open it with the RAR Extractor, or convert it to ZIP before forwarding.

Why your archive barely got smaller

JPG, PNG, MP4, MP3 and most PDFs are already compressed, so archiving them saves 0–5%. Big savings (50–90%) come from text, code, CSV, logs, databases and uncompressed images or audio. To shrink videos, use the Video Compressor. It reduces the actual video data rather than packing it.

Compression levels explained

Store just bundles files (instant). Fast gives most of the benefit quickly. Normal is the default sweet spot. Ultra squeezes out the last few percent at 3–5× the time. It's worth it for backups you'll keep for years.

Frequently asked questions

Is 7Z safer than ZIP?
Both use AES-256. 7Z can also hide the file names, which ZIP can't.
Does compression damage files?
Never. Archives are lossless, unlike MP3 or JPG compression.

Rate this tool

Be the first to rate it.

More guides